Stipulation extending time within which to file reply brief, L.A. n. 9778 : Lillita Louise Chaplin vs Charles Spencer Chaplin ; The Chaplin Studios/Supreme Court of the State of California

1927/05/19

Content reserved

Content reserved

The time within which to file reply brief is extended to June 20th 1927.

Legal; Legal proceedings
Legal document
Signed typescript (carbon copy)
Grey Chaplin, Lita - Divorce
California : Supreme Court
Grey, Lita Chaplin, Charles Young, Lyndol Lester
Chaplin Studios
1 leaf ; 33x21 cm.
ECCI00011300, CH114
Ms. signature of Lita Grey's attorney Lyndol L. Young.

Part of Series: Legal proceedings

See more
ch1385001.jpg
5

[Legal act] Charles Chaplin Plaintiff against Otis Lithograph Company, Joseph Seiden [...] dated February 21, 1918/District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York

1917/02/21

ch1390001.jpg
11

[Correspondence] Nov. 9, 1917-March 1, 1918/Albert Bogges ; Nathan Burkan

1917/11/09-1918/03/01

ch1382001.jpg
7

Copy decree/United States District Court Southern District of New York

1917/12/05

ch1386001.jpg
4

[Legal act] Charles Chaplin Plaintiff against Otis Lithograph Company, Joseph Seiden [...] dated December 8, 1917/District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York

1917/12/08

Other records for Type: Legal document

See more
ch02135001.jpg
1

Extracts from the minutes of the St. Saviours ... Board of Guardians

1896/06/09

ch1445001.jpg
1

Digest of questions/prepared by Seabury for Anderson to answer

[1916/05]

ch1438001.jpg
11

Essanay vs. Chaplin

[1916/05]

ch1441001.jpg
67

Charles Chaplin : Plaintiff, against Vitagraph-Lubin-Selig-Essanay, Inc., and the Essanay Film Manufacturing Company : Defendants/Supreme Court-New York County

1916/12/05