Search | Search | Stipulation extending time within which to file reply brief, L.A. n. 9777 : Lillita Louise Chaplin vs Charles Spencer Chaplin ; Chaplin Studios/Supreme Court of the State of California

Content reserved

Stipulation extending time within which to file reply brief to June 20th 1927.

Series

Legal; Legal proceedings

Type

Legal document

Nature

Typescript (carbon copy)

Subject

Grey Chaplin, Lita - Divorce

Main organisation

California : Supreme Court

Secondary author

Grey, Lita Chaplin, Charles Young, Lyndol Lester McNab, Gavin Wright, Loyd Schmulowitz, Nat Millikan, Charles E.

Secondary organisation

Chaplin Studios

Physical description

1 leaf ; 33x21 cm.

Record number

ECCI00011323, CH114

Notes

Typewritten signature of Lita Grey's attorney, L. L. Young, and of Chaplin's attorneys: Gavin McNab, Loyd Wright, Nat Schmulowitz and Charles E. Millikan.

Stipulation extending time within which to file reply brief, L.A. n. 9777 : Lillita Louise Chaplin vs Charles Spencer Chaplin ; Chaplin Studios/Supreme Court of the State of California

[Legal act] Charles Chaplin Plaintiff against Otis Lithograph Company, Joseph Seiden [...] dated February 21, 1918/District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York

[Correspondence] Nov. 9, 1917-March 1, 1918/Albert Bogges ; Nathan Burkan

Copy decree/United States District Court Southern District of New York

[Legal act] Charles Chaplin Plaintiff against Otis Lithograph Company, Joseph Seiden [...] dated December 8, 1917/District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York

Extracts from the minutes of the St. Saviours ... Board of Guardians

Digest of questions/prepared by Seabury for Anderson to answer

Essanay vs. Chaplin

Charles Chaplin : Plaintiff, against Vitagraph-Lubin-Selig-Essanay, Inc., and the Essanay Film Manufacturing Company : Defendants/Supreme Court-New York County