Search | Search | [The Gold Rush pirating – Germany. Correspondence with dr. Stroth. 1971]

1 / 104

Correspondence and legal documents relating to the lawsuit concerning the unauthorised distribution of The Gold Rush in Germany, involving Charles Chaplin/Roy Export Company against Monopol Film, and Montana Film. Among those involved is Raymond Rohauer. It includes: a summary of official records about Berne Convention, a copy of a legal brief about "dramatic composition", legal costs, a copy of the legal brief, documents related to The Gold Rush's distribution.

Film/Project

The Gold Rush

Series

Legal; Violation of copyright Distribution and promotion Legal; Legal Miscellaneous Legal; Legal proceedings

Type

Correspondence; Letter Legal document

Nature

Typescript (original, copy)

Primary author

Ford, Rachel M. Stroth, Rolf Rüdiger

Main organisation

Roy Export Company Atlas Film

Secondary author

Mr. Correll Schottenfeld, Herbert T. Jacoby, Herbert P. Chaplin, Charles Spencer Rüede, Thomas Rothman, Moses

Place of dispatch

Frankfurt am Main New York New York

Physical description

103 leaves ; [21x29,5 cm.]

Notes

Original files's copies in German are available at Montreux's public archives.

Record number

ECCIN0000773, CH411

Letterhead

Dr. Rolf-Rüdiger Stroth, Francoforte ; Schwarts, Mermelstein, Burns, Lesser & Jacoby, New York ; Advokaturbureau Dr. Otto Irminger, Zurich

[The Gold Rush pirating – Germany. Correspondence with dr. Stroth. 1971]

[The Gold Rush pirating – Germany. General summary]

[Letter, 1915, to Sidney Chaplin]/James F. Pershing

[Letter, 1915, to Sydney Chaplin]/James F. Pershing

[Letter, 1915, to] Sydney Chaplin/James F. Pershing

[Letter] 1915 August 20, Chicago [to] Sydney Chaplin/James F. Pershing

The Lancashire Lads

[Playbill of the performance of the Lancashire Lads scheduled for 9 May 1898]

[Fred Karno's Companies bus/Unknown]

[These are the vehicles]

This agreement, made and entered into at Los Angeles, California, this 29th day of December 1921/by and between Charles Chaplin and Edna Purviance

[Letter from Nathan Burkan to Lloyd Wright]

n.2 Sydney Chaplin general correspondence [Letters from Alfred Reeves to Sydney Chaplin]

Barney Gerard Re: claim “The Great Dictator”

[Legal act] Charles Chaplin Plaintiff against Otis Lithograph Company, Joseph Seiden [...] dated February 21, 1918/District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York

[Correspondence] Nov. 9, 1917-March 1, 1918/Albert Bogges ; Nathan Burkan

Copy decree/United States District Court Southern District of New York

[Legal act] Charles Chaplin Plaintiff against Otis Lithograph Company, Joseph Seiden [...] dated December 8, 1917/District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York

[Letter] 1897, November 16th [s.l. to] S. Chaplin

[Letter] 1904 July 5, London [to] Sydney Chaplin/Charles [illegible]

[Envelope, 1905, London to] Charles Chaplin/[Hannah Chaplin]

[Letter 1905 to Sydney Chaplin and Charles Chaplin/Hannah Chaplin]

Extracts from the minutes of the St. Saviours ... Board of Guardians

Digest of questions/prepared by Seabury for Anderson to answer

Essanay vs. Chaplin

Charles Chaplin : Plaintiff, against Vitagraph-Lubin-Selig-Essanay, Inc., and the Essanay Film Manufacturing Company : Defendants/Supreme Court-New York County