[Letter] 1952 May 1, New York [to] Charles Chaplin/Arthur W. Kelly

1952

Content reserved

Content reserved

Discussion on film distribution policies to limit United Artists' exposure and costs.

Limelight
Legal; Legal proceedings
Correspondence; Letter
Typescript (carbon copy)
Kelly, Josephine - Case
Kelly, Arthur W.
Chaplin, Charles
New York
Hollywood
The attached translation is included in the file "Traduzioni dei documenti agli atti".
2 leaves ; 28 cm. + 2 leaves
ECCI00019223, CH069

Is part of

Content reserved

Dame Kelly contre Chaplin : Pièces du défendeur : Originaux Onglet n. 1 : Première partie

1947

Part of Series: Legal proceedings

See more
ch1385001.jpg
5

[Legal act] Charles Chaplin Plaintiff against Otis Lithograph Company, Joseph Seiden [...] dated February 21, 1918/District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York

1917/02/21

ch1390001.jpg
11

[Correspondence] Nov. 9, 1917-March 1, 1918/Albert Bogges ; Nathan Burkan

1917/11/09-1918/03/01

ch1382001.jpg
7

Copy decree/United States District Court Southern District of New York

1917/12/05

ch1386001.jpg
4

[Legal act] Charles Chaplin Plaintiff against Otis Lithograph Company, Joseph Seiden [...] dated December 8, 1917/District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York

1917/12/08

Other records for Type: Letter

See more
ch02136001.jpg
1

[Letter] 1897, November 16th [s.l. to] S. Chaplin

1897/11/16

ch08014001.jpg
1

[Letter] 1904 July 5, London [to] Sydney Chaplin/Charles [illegible]

1904/07/05

ch08016001.jpg
1

[Envelope, 1905, London to] Charles Chaplin/[Hannah Chaplin]

1905

ch08018001.jpg
2

[Letter 1905 to Sydney Chaplin and Charles Chaplin/Hannah Chaplin]

1905